« The Bader Blog

Warrant? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Warrant...So Says...

by Jerry Bader
The IRS. Can't say this attitude or belief is shocking. Their argument:


In a 2009 handbook, the IRS said the Fourth Amendment does not protect emails because Internet users "do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in such communications." A 2010 presentation by the IRS Office of General Counsel reiterated the policy. Under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) of 1986, government officials only need a subpoena, issued without a judge's approval, to read emails that have been opened or that are more than 180 days old. Privacy groups such as the ACLU argue that the Fourth Amendment provides greater privacy protections than the ECPA, and that officials should need a warrant to access all emails and other private messages. 

I agree with the ACLU on this one; how can the 4th amendment not cover emails and other private messages? Internet users "do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in such communications?" Really?